As the Android vs iPhone debate rages the bottom line becomes clear: Android is open source which allows users to create their own interface and apps. This ability to customize apps for each individual android user fuels the Android vs iPhone debate by offering an alternative to Apple’s neatly trimmed garden of Apps. This customizability creates a more personal connection with the device both psychologically and technically. 

While Apple’s iPhone provides access to a seductive garden of applications, no matter how seductive Apple’s walled garden of content appears, not everyone wants to play in their garden. The Android market is the antithesis of Apple’s secret garden being geared towards users who want to plant their own gardens and tend to them as they see fit. To draw an interesting analogy, look at the popular facebook game Farmville. In the game people plant their own crops, build their own chicken coups and maintain a virtual farm tailored to their personal specifications. This type of customizability clearly demonstrates why there is even an Android vs iPhone debate to begin with. Regardless of what side your on, both platforms offer a personal connection with a virtual space users call their own. Just the like the virtual farms of Farmville, users of Android and iPhones are both offered the ability to cultivate a custom look and app selection individual to each user. This, ironically, is where the Android vs iPhone separation merges; in the user’s ability to customize their phone and thus provide a common ground for the Android vs iPhone debate. Both essentially do the same thing, but the android allows users the source code the apps and endless customizability, making the the android the clear winner in the android vs iphone debate.